<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: REVIEW Apexel Macro, Wide and Tele Mobile Phone Lens For iPhone, Galaxy, Xperia	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tehnoblog.org/review-apexel-macro-wide-tele-mobile-phone-lens-for-iphone-galaxy-xperia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tehnoblog.org/review-apexel-macro-wide-tele-mobile-phone-lens-for-iphone-galaxy-xperia/</link>
	<description>phones ● computers ● audio ● video ● technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:09:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TehnoBlog		</title>
		<link>https://tehnoblog.org/review-apexel-macro-wide-tele-mobile-phone-lens-for-iphone-galaxy-xperia/#comment-546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TehnoBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tehnoblog.org/?p=3148#comment-546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://tehnoblog.org/review-apexel-macro-wide-tele-mobile-phone-lens-for-iphone-galaxy-xperia/#comment-545&quot;&gt;SkepticsR_us&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi, thanks! I&#039;ll consider your suggestions, however, keep in mind that postage stamps or banknotes are very different in shape, size and design across different countries. It was a real challenge for me how to create a universal test that anyone can reproduce on their end.

Those Sandmarc lenses are interesting, but they are also a bit too expensive for me, particularly if I take into account shipping costs, so it&#039;s unlikely that I will ever test them. Also worth noting, each phone model (or generation) uses different lenses and sensors, so technically, those adapters should be matched, as well. You can mix and match lens adapters and phone models/brands with more or less good results, but ideally, lens attachments should match specific phone model(s) for best possible results. And that is additional cost factor to take into account.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://tehnoblog.org/review-apexel-macro-wide-tele-mobile-phone-lens-for-iphone-galaxy-xperia/#comment-545">SkepticsR_us</a>.</p>
<p>Hi, thanks! I&#8217;ll consider your suggestions, however, keep in mind that postage stamps or banknotes are very different in shape, size and design across different countries. It was a real challenge for me how to create a universal test that anyone can reproduce on their end.</p>
<p>Those Sandmarc lenses are interesting, but they are also a bit too expensive for me, particularly if I take into account shipping costs, so it&#8217;s unlikely that I will ever test them. Also worth noting, each phone model (or generation) uses different lenses and sensors, so technically, those adapters should be matched, as well. You can mix and match lens adapters and phone models/brands with more or less good results, but ideally, lens attachments should match specific phone model(s) for best possible results. And that is additional cost factor to take into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkepticsR_us		</title>
		<link>https://tehnoblog.org/review-apexel-macro-wide-tele-mobile-phone-lens-for-iphone-galaxy-xperia/#comment-545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkepticsR_us]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tehnoblog.org/?p=3148#comment-545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like the fact that in your YouTube video you used a grid/graph paper with 1x1 cm (main squares) and 1x1 mm subdivisions so we can figure out the actual magnification, the minimum size capture grab, and the overall image quality across the whole frame.

Could you do the same with the Sandmarc lens?

youtu.be/BR1TuEEq_fA

But, instead of using a KEYBOARD, why not use something like a small POSTAGE STAMP, printed with clear halftone dots?
Thanks again for the review.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fact that in your YouTube video you used a grid/graph paper with 1&#215;1 cm (main squares) and 1&#215;1 mm subdivisions so we can figure out the actual magnification, the minimum size capture grab, and the overall image quality across the whole frame.</p>
<p>Could you do the same with the Sandmarc lens?</p>
<p>youtu.be/BR1TuEEq_fA</p>
<p>But, instead of using a KEYBOARD, why not use something like a small POSTAGE STAMP, printed with clear halftone dots?<br />
Thanks again for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
